//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
TL;dr The Supreme Court has turbocharged the demise of decades of workplace antidiscrimination laws, practices, and guidance — and for other areas where disparate impact liability is a key civil rights enforcement tool. As one longtime civil rights lawyer told me: They’re running the table.
Relying heavily on Louisiana v. Callais, the Trump administration has determined that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 may violate the Constitution’s equal-protection guarantee if interpreted to impose liability for workplace practices that have a disparate impact on employees. Opinion:
Yup.
*takes a deep breath*