//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
Who you say you are, what you say you believe, your identity as a citizen of this country, are all on the table. “Are you prepared to stand and watch as Black political representation is erased? Do you not yet understand that this is also your fight if you have any hope of living in a democracy?”
A friend sent along this Pride slop. I don’t know whether to laugh or weep.
5d
5d
6d
Relying heavily on Louisiana v. Callais, the Trump administration has determined that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 may violate the Constitution’s equal-protection guarantee if interpreted to impose liability for workplace practices that have a disparate impact on employees. Opinion:
TL;dr The Supreme Court has turbocharged the demise of decades of workplace antidiscrimination laws, practices, and guidance — and for other areas where disparate impact liability is a key civil rights enforcement tool. As one longtime civil rights lawyer told me: They’re running the table.