Software engineer. FIRST Robotics Competition mentor.
Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations 🖖
Opinions are my own. Repost != Endorsement.
Nick Manos
Loading...
one thing that I think we need to realize is that not all political persuasion needs to be in the "convince a person to vote for a candidate" form — finding ways to demoralize and de-energize your opposition who would never vote for you is very valuable too
Ah, so Andy Weir is like... *dumb* dumb
gizmodo.com/andy-weir-st...
The constitutional remedy for a cabinet secretary who is profiting off advance notice of an illegal, undeclared war is impeachment, removal, disqualification, and a criminal trial.
The UK government is exploring triggering the break clause in Palantir’s NHS contract, the FT reports.
A big and absolutely correct step.
My "We don't allow bets on assassinations and murder" ad campaign has people asking a lot of questions already answered by the ad campaign
A thing that litigants simply do not understand is that ChatGPT logs are not privileged and are fully discoverable, and until litigants actually realize that LLMs will be a bigger danger to litigants than to attorneys.
My mind still has some degree of trouble grappling with how much trump made “war for oil” not a lefty slogan against the government but just open policy
Moderation decisions should be based on behaviors performed inside your own environment and offsite activity shouldn’t count, unless you can figure out a way to do that and avoid brigading, faked screenshots, and AI-generated falsehoods (everything after the “unless” is basically impossible).
Every time I make the (correct) statement that social media use is not universally bad for teenagers, or state that the best consensus is that it's beneficial-to-neutral for many and any negative effects are a small subset of teenagers, people demand citations (and then refuse to believe them, sigh)
