//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...








Loading...
THE ECONOMIC PUZZLE: This creates a #commitment-problem. When bidders have a 2nd chance at lower prices, they strategically withhold bids even when their valuation exceeds the reserve. Bidders only enter auctions if their value exceeds a threshold 2-10x higher than the reserve.
THE EMPIRICAL CHALLENGE: We can't directly observe bidder valuations, so we combine auction theory with data on outcomes (no sale/noncompetitive sale/competitive auction) to structurally estimate bidder behavior using data on BLM auctions, then simulate different auction formats.
THE BIG INSIGHT: Secondary noncompetitive sales undermine reserve prices as a revenue tool BUT the net effect depends heavily on post-sale revenues (royalties, rentals). These only occur if leases are actually sold, and generate most revenues - not the initial sale