//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Not done learning yet… Here for politics, books, and Hot Tooks (ok, mostly for Peregrin). Also education and parenting. AuDHD. 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ rights = human rights. I’ve got a creepy ex and a public job, so this profile is happily anonymous. ✌️









Loading...
Isolation, dependence, and total control—this is how coercive control erodes your identity piece by piece. #domesticabuseawareness #emotionalabuse
Someone on here had their students write a paper using Claude and then read them all to the class so they could see how blandly similar they all were
I saw a TikTok this morning where a person in marketing said she was frustrated because she just spent the day looking at decks from 7 different companies and they were all identical and clearly made by Claude. When everyone uses AI to make keynotes, powerpoints, books, everything becomes the same.
1d
1d
1d
I saw a TikTok this morning where a person in marketing said she was frustrated because she just spent the day looking at decks from 7 different companies and they were all identical and clearly made by Claude. When everyone uses AI to make keynotes, powerpoints, books, everything becomes the same.
i think boarding school teenage masculinity is a part of masculinity but not of manhood. we have to get away from the concept of the opposite of "man" being "woman." the opposite of "man" is "boy"
Jacqueline Antonovich
Kevin M. Kruse
Shadows of Control
When utilized in literature review, LLMs consistently 1. fail to mention female authors in female-led literatures, 2. insist that men are more influential or more heavily cited when this is contradicted by objective citation counts, and 3. attribute women’s work to hallucinated male scholars.