//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Not buying it.
AI Skeptic









Loading...
There's a wikipedia page. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_...
highly recommend this—fantastic episode with @tjheffernan.bsky.social, one of the most coherent and powerful voices on AI: pca.st/episode/e683...
This is a great read
Mark Carney’s AI strategy suggests Canadians’ concerns about AI will evaporate if they become more “literate” about the technology. In trying to boost industry, Carney ignores many of the biggest concerns about generative AI and data centres. If anyone needs to become more AI literate, it’s him.
This 30-minute interview with Lucy Suchman is very thought-provoking
Please Use AI
Also falls short on the economy, on societal benefits, and on overall purpose...
Cal Newport gives an excellent explanation of the measurement of improvement in AI-based coding tools. At the end he says AI companies should reject hyperbolic claims about “existential AI risk”. I don’t think he gets that they love this stuff because it touts the supposed power of their products.
So much of AI-boosterism is just wildly enthusiastic extrapolation. And that's a reckless way to make decisions.
I feel like in the last few months, the pushback against AI is really getting going. Hallelujah!