//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
Our new study (Debray*, Karami* et al.) explores how the brain encodes basic math concepts (integers, fractions, shapes). Samuel Debray led the 7T fMRI & behavioral work; I led the MEG. @danielavalerio.bsky.social @chrplr.bsky.social @standehaene.bsky.social www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
1mo
With the cumulative model, we get an added benefit: it yields precise hypotheses about the mental representation of each number. For instance, 24 is most likely represented as 4×6, but also as 2×12, 3×8, or the successor of 23—in that order.
Some of this isn’t new. Dehaene & Mehler (1992) already showed that number word frequencies follow a ~1/n² law. They suggested that while cultural or environmental factors could explain some of the frequency curve, the psychological organization of number concepts must play a major role.
Building on this, we tested a new cognitive model based on a Language of Thought (LoT) introduced by Dehaene et al., 2025. The idea: number concepts are constructed in the mind using simple building blocks—1, +, and ×.
11mo
11mo