//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...




Observation of stone tools alone did not enable participants to identify a technique with which they were unfamiliar--despite extensive knapping experience and knowledge. Practical experience of a technique seemed to be required to identify it on artefacts.
Check out our new paper! (1/5) www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... @err-ring.bsky.social @kkshimizu1.bsky.social @markstoneking.bsky.social @balthasarbickel.bsky.social @chiarabarbieri.bsky.social @isle-uzh.bsky.social @nccrlanguage.bsky.social
Results suggest that direct contact between palaeolithic groups was likely required for the transmission of novel knapping techniques.
First preprint @socarxiv.bsky.social of my PhD research: doi.org/10.31235/osf... To what extent may reverse-engineering have enabled the transmission of novel stone tool techniques between palaeolithic groups? Thanks to participants & coders! Very grateful to coauthors @marie.soressi.bsky.social