Thrilled this is finally out in its JOP-formatted version! Hope it's useful to anyone working on LGBT politics, (electoral) discrimination, status differentials within & across identity categories, and non-textual experiments. Main findings in quoted thread. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10....
I really hope that Sociology reforms. My main work is reanalyzing other scholars' experiments in service of meta-analysis. It's only possible because transparency is embraced so thoroughly by our political science community. Most exps are posted; i'm getting ~80% when I email for the rest.
We have a new paper out on what the large conjoint literature tells us about public opinion on immigrant characteristics:
I'm thrilled to share that my dissertation has been selected as the co-winner of the Best Dissertation Award from the APSA Women, Gender, and Politics Section. Many thanks to the award committee, and to mentors and colleagues who offered support along the way!
🚨NEW PUBLICATION🚨 in Science Advances. We meta-reanalyze 100 conjoint experiments to assess which immigrants citizens prefer around the world. Our evidence reinforces existing findings, identifies novel insights, and provides a basis for future research 1/n www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
this is so interesting, i think this is basically a kind of ecological study
🌟 New article
👥 Eelco Harteveld, Lars Erik Berntzen, Andrej Kokkonen, Haylee Kelsall, Jonas Linde & Stefan Dahlberg
👉 The (alleged) consequences of affective polarization: A survey experiment in nine democracies
📗 European Journal of Political Research
🔗 www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
He talked about description as well, including the specific recommendation to avoid associational language, simply because it has become so ambiguous (so not "is SES associated with Y" but rather: do people of different SES differ on average in Y).>
