🚨NEW PUBLICATION🚨 in Science Advances. We meta-reanalyze 100 conjoint experiments to assess which immigrants citizens prefer around the world. Our evidence reinforces existing findings, identifies novel insights, and provides a basis for future research 1/n www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org
Meta-reanalysis of 100 conjoint experiments reveals patterns of similarity and variation in public immigration preferences worldwide.
Read this #OpenAccess article by Amanda Sahar d’Urso in American Political Science Review, "What Happens When You Can’t Check the Box? Categorization Threat and Public Opinion among Middle Eastern and North African Americans"
I really hope that Sociology reforms. My main work is reanalyzing other scholars' experiments in service of meta-analysis. It's only possible because transparency is embraced so thoroughly by our political science community. Most exps are posted; i'm getting ~80% when I email for the rest.
We have a new paper out on what the large conjoint literature tells us about public opinion on immigrant characteristics:
politicalsciencenow.com
What Happens When You Can’t Check the Box? Categorization Threat and Public Opinion among Middle Eastern and North African Americans By Amanda Sahar d’Urso, Georgetown University Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) Americans are politically visible yet institutionally invisible, long categorized as “white” by the U.S. government despite neither self-categorizing nor racially assigned as such. Most forms—across public and private sectors—still lack a “MENA” category option.
🌟 New article
👥 Eelco Harteveld, Lars Erik Berntzen, Andrej Kokkonen, Haylee Kelsall, Jonas Linde & Stefan Dahlberg
👉 The (alleged) consequences of affective polarization: A survey experiment in nine democracies
📗 European Journal of Political Research
🔗 www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
this is so interesting, i think this is basically a kind of ecological study
Thrilled this is finally out in its JOP-formatted version! Hope it's useful to anyone working on LGBT politics, (electoral) discrimination, status differentials within & across identity categories, and non-textual experiments. Main findings in quoted thread. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10....
APSA
🚨NEW PUBLICATION🚨 in Science Advances. We meta-reanalyze 100 conjoint experiments to assess which immigrants citizens prefer around the world. Our evidence reinforces existing findings, identifies novel insights, and provides a basis for future research 1/n www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Meta-reanalysis of 100 conjoint experiments reveals patterns of similarity and variation in public immigration preferences worldwide.
He talked about description as well, including the specific recommendation to avoid associational language, simply because it has become so ambiguous (so not "is SES associated with Y" but rather: do people of different SES differ on average in Y).>
