//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileHeaderAlt
by @jakesimonds.com
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Asst Prof. of US History at UNC Chapel Hill. Basketball, running, cats. Go celtics go heels. Political liberal, hoop reactionary.
Joe Stieb









Loading...
Trump argues that birthright citizenship was only for “babies of slaves.” Except, the Supreme Court ruled in 1898 that it applies to everyone born here. That particular case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, was about a Chinese immigrant’s son. Not a freed slave. In short, he lied. AGAIN.
Hey asshole: the straits were open before you started this pointless war.
There will be much living space!
www.nytimes.com/2026/03/31/o... Good piece.
33m
I think we need an inverse thread where we talk about things that normal intelligent people universally agree upon that are for some reason hot takes within your profession
23h
14h
1h
16h
I want folls to keep in mind that at some point, they will circle around another group. It maybe yours next time. Silence isn't an option.
Why does it sound like the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere?
www.nytimes.com
Opinion | The People Trump Pardoned Are on a Crime Spree
Joe Stieb
Joe Stieb
16h
Joe Stieb
14h
Jake Anbinder
The-Autistic-Artist 🥥 🍀 🏳️‍🌈 Doomsday and Coyote vs. Acme Era
What's something that experts/practitioners in your field universally agree upon, but that remains a "hot take" among the general public?