climate risk, corporations, use & abuse of science & econ in the administrative state
papers: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1654671
sometimes I am here and sometimes I am not
Madison Condon
Loading...
Unless your approach to "make America build big things again" is just deleting rules so builders can freely harm people, it really should include building out a big, highly-trained government workforce to interpret and enforce rules and to help builders comply with them. Quickly and in parallel!
lol just stumbled upon some Massachusetts sea level rise maps from 2006 that highlight where "structural shore protection almost certain" (meaning the makers think we'll build a sea wall) and guess what we have not built those sea walls
OMG. THIS IS AMAZING.
It also wouldn't be necessary IF big media organization did the most basic thing they should do and LINKED TO THE DOCKET.
Fun looking remote workshop in September:
Responsible Modelling Under Uncertainty
rmu2.org
RIP E&E News
reminds me of that paper that's like an amoc collapse could save the amazon
wow Shell is trying to get expert witness Naomi Oreskes's AI prompts in discovery as part of this endless failure to adapt case
Magistrate judge grants order, district court stays
this article is like a madlib of all of my interests
will one scary climate-fueled anomaly save us from another scary climate-fueled anomaly
On behalf of the entire insurance industry, can i nudge any paleo-ENSO experts to write an op-ed addressing the Q whether the forecast El Niño has a chance to be the strongest in (at least?) the late Holocene?
A federal judge ordered an environmental group to turn over an expert witness’s AI “prompts” in a lawsuit against Shell.