I assign an AI evaluation in my classes. Here’s what I’ve learned:
Unless you’re an expert, you can’t see the slop for what it is. You have to deeply know a subject to smell the bullshit.
What this guy is doing isn’t being edgy, he’s revealing that he’s too ignorant to understand this basic fact:
This is the creator dilemma I find myself in: on the one hand, I can share honest content that’s not AI slop, but on the other hand, that content will then be stollen and used to make more AI slop. How to do??
Reading for the Hugo Awards?
Try the finalist for Best Short Story "10 Visions of the Future; or, Self-Care for the End of Days" by Samantha Mills @samtasticbooks.com!
It also placed 2nd in the Uncanny Poll! You can read it here or in the Hugo packet!
buff.ly/7IFySa1
Who, specifically, ordered the Ocean Observatory Initiative destroyed? Someone made this decision.
Reporters, get on this.
www.livescience.com/planet-earth...
I wrote about one specific way AI is ruining my life
defector.com/ai-animal-vi...
Some can smell the BS even w/o the background knowledge, but it still takes a ton of work to verify. Almost a PhD’s worth of work, you might say