This is the creator dilemma I find myself in: on the one hand, I can share honest content that’s not AI slop, but on the other hand, that content will then be stollen and used to make more AI slop. How to do??
I wrote about one specific way AI is ruining my life
defector.com/ai-animal-vi...
Wake up y’all new structure ambiguity exercise just dropped. #linguistics
Reading for the Hugo Awards?
Try the finalist for Best Short Story "10 Visions of the Future; or, Self-Care for the End of Days" by Samantha Mills @samtasticbooks.com!
It also placed 2nd in the Uncanny Poll! You can read it here or in the Hugo packet!
buff.ly/7IFySa1
Happy World Ocean Day!
Who, specifically, ordered the Ocean Observatory Initiative destroyed? Someone made this decision.
Reporters, get on this.
www.livescience.com/planet-earth...
Some can smell the BS even w/o the background knowledge, but it still takes a ton of work to verify. Almost a PhD’s worth of work, you might say
I assign an AI evaluation in my classes. Here’s what I’ve learned:
Unless you’re an expert, you can’t see the slop for what it is. You have to deeply know a subject to smell the bullshit.
What this guy is doing isn’t being edgy, he’s revealing that he’s too ignorant to understand this basic fact: