//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
Wake up y’all new structure ambiguity exercise just dropped. #linguistics
This is the creator dilemma I find myself in: on the one hand, I can share honest content that’s not AI slop, but on the other hand, that content will then be stollen and used to make more AI slop. How to do??
Reading for the Hugo Awards? Try the finalist for Best Short Story "10 Visions of the Future; or, Self-Care for the End of Days" by Samantha Mills @samtasticbooks.com! It also placed 2nd in the Uncanny Poll! You can read it here or in the Hugo packet! buff.ly/7IFySa1
Happy World Ocean Day!
Who, specifically, ordered the Ocean Observatory Initiative destroyed? Someone made this decision. Reporters, get on this. www.livescience.com/planet-earth...
Some can smell the BS even w/o the background knowledge, but it still takes a ton of work to verify. Almost a PhD’s worth of work, you might say
I assign an AI evaluation in my classes. Here’s what I’ve learned: Unless you’re an expert, you can’t see the slop for what it is. You have to deeply know a subject to smell the bullshit. What this guy is doing isn’t being edgy, he’s revealing that he’s too ignorant to understand this basic fact: