I have an important link for everyone who liked the previous post:
“the ethical problems w/ sharing high-quality qualitative data…hinge on the harm of being named….
exempting in-depth interviews from data sharing requirements is essential for legal, ethical, & logistical reasons, & for ensuring the future viability of qualitative research.”🧪
@jessicacalarco.com 👊
Gretchen McCulloch
If you’ll be at the World Conferences on Research Integrity, consider joining our pres, “Friendly Ghosts?”.
We’ll discuss authorship dilemmas when contributors decline.
Tuesday, 11.15am, Stream G.
Me, Jennifer Wright, and Michael Vincent
#WCRI2026 #researchintegrity @wcrifoundation.bsky.social
You can now watch Jeremy's excellent talk on the term "association" and what it's even supposed to be referring to on YouTube. Must watch if you're doing associational research!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKdC...
I've recently been featured on a Postdoc Spotlight for @ctnplus.bsky.social.
As people may know, I started off in social psychology studying anti-immigrant prejudice. This spotlight highlights how I've taken what I've learned to inform my work in public health, and particularly in HIV stigma.
We made an open repository of close relationships measures. Our goal is to catalogue all of the published self-report measures in relationship science.
You can help us expand the database by suggesting measures you tend to use in your research, or by uploading your own measures!
relascale.com
jenna newman phd
relascale.com
RelaScale is a searchable database of psychological measures and constructs for relationship researchers.
Dr. Paolo Palma joined the CTN+ in 2025 as a postdoctoral fellow. Grounded by a background in social psychology, he’s driven to understand the health impact of prejudice and discrimination, and how we...
OKAY! For the first time in a long time, I have NO outstanding journal articles to review! Finally!! Is this what inbox zero feels like?!
Mark Hooper
I'm not going to provide details, so don't ask. Nevertheless:
No, it is not OK to have one hallucinated cite. No, you can't delete that and expect me to take the rest of your work seriously. No, absolutely not. It should never ever happen.
*as far as I'm aware 😳
Wow! Glad we have the chance to voice some concerns!
tc.canada.ca/en/corporate...
NEW from me in @pnas.org on the risks of data sharing with qualitative research:
"Today, confidentiality risks are amplified by social media, surveillance, and AI tools, which make ample data about people publicly available, thus making deidentification less effective"
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
