//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
Last year, the Pickering Lands were promised protection, but now developers & the City of Pickering are proposing more sprawl on these public lands. Meanwhile, the same MPs once praised for protecting them have gone quiet. 🤔 Don’t let them off the hook: buff.ly/p6sBwKo
Are we being played? ⚾️ With baseball season back, we’re continuing our series unpacking the claims behind Ontario’s Ring of Fire ads that flooded our screens during last year’s World Series run. So, will developing the Ring of Fire add $22 billion to our economy?
In baseball, even close calls go under review. Given the lack of any clear basis for these claims, this one would likely be overturned. Verdict: We’re being played ⚠️
“This isn’t just a local issue,” says Anna Baggio. “It has broader climate and economic implications, especially when you consider the role of peatlands as a major carbon sink.” Read more here: buff.ly/bzc6dzu
Are we being played? ⚾️ Here’s the next claim, pulled directly from the province’s Ring of Fire advertising: Developing the Ring of Fire will create 70,000 jobs.