//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
Across all five languages, π‘£π‘Žπ‘™π‘’π‘’π‘  conveys a vague sense of the good yet serve clear discursive functions – anchoring personal identities and mediating relationships through boundary work.
We find π‘£π‘Žπ‘™π‘’π‘’π‘  discourse to reflect transnational norms of authenticity and autonomy: - Everyone is entitled to their own values. Value imposition is condemned. - One should be loyal to their values. It is better, it seems, to hold bad values authentically than profess good ones insincerely.
We find π‘£π‘Žπ‘™π‘’π‘’π‘  functions as a conversation-stopper. If it is bad form to argue with another's values, then introducing values into a discussion may serve as a tool od decontestation, insulating oneself from criticism and effectively ending the conversation.