//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
Yes! tbh this method is probably much more immediately useful for helping one understand subtle differences between [models trained on] subtly different data subsets, vs a loftier goal of helping one find "the" best data mixture -- to anyone considering this method, please feel free to reach out :)
May 6, 2025
Clara Na
The method in this paper was designed to find an optimal data mixture. But researchers in the human sciences who are training models *in order to understand the effect of the data* might also consider this as a clever way of evaluating hundreds of subsets without training hundreds of models. #MLSky
May 5, 2025
Building/customizing your own LLM? You'll want to curate training data for it, but how do you know what makes the data good? You can try out recipes👩‍🍳 iterate on ✨vibes✨ but we can't actually test all possible combos of tweaks,,, right?? 🙅‍♂️WRONG! arxiv.org/abs/2410.15661 (1/n) 🧵
Nov 5, 2024
Clara Na
🔈For the SoLaR workshop @COLM_conf we are soliciting opinion abstracts to encourage new perspectives and opinions on responsible language modeling, 1-2 of which will be selected to be presented at the workshop. Please use the google form below to submit your opinion abstract ⬇️