You really should be using scholar inbox. Don't want to gate keep how useful this is: www.scholar-inbox.com
I've been offline more than usual because of paper and grant deadlines plus work travel, but I'm back with my first real newsletter today! Click for rambling about infrastructure, benchmarks, Babylonian tablets, and more.
Scholar Inbox is a free personal paper recommender enabling researchers to stay up-to-date with the most relevant progress in their field. Daily indexes arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, ChemRxiv and open acce...
www.scholar-inbox.com
In which I reflect on the a recent trip to Chicago, overview the state of OCR for humanities data, and fangirl over Hugging Face infrastructure.
In 2017 I taught a course at Berkeley on computational text analysis in history. KT took that course. And she *took* it. She did all the readings, did all assignments, was super active in class. And since then we've had a really close relationship. I also aspire to be KT. We all should.
Laura K. Nelson
Are you a Bluesky user or developer?
Princeton's HCI group is conducting an IRB-approved interview study on perspectives about generative AI (genAI) in decentralized social media.
Participation includes:
• 45–60 min Zoom interview
• $30 USD digital gift card
Signup: forms.gle/EDmcLnjbamtb...
Higher ed is losing, I would counter, unless we organize.
one funny thing in this Pew report on Americans' AI usage is that respondents are more likely to predict AI will have a negative impact than a positive impact, but when you ask them how it impacts them personally across different areas, each area tilts positive, mostly by a lot
when claude says "I have everything." it probably feels great
To look at the bright side: Isn’t this an interesting problem to have?
