//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
One year ago today, 300+ NIH scientists and staff risked their livelihoods by signing the Bethesda Declaration to call out government leadership for harms to science and patients... ...today, their new report documents continuing harm to science and the American public. www.27unihted.org/bd-home
This just out in Diabetes Care. The need to highlight the destructive plans of the administration continues. Everyone needs to post comments to the OMB website. Relevant links in the article. Don’t delay!! diabetesjournals.org/care/article...
The proposed new rules on federal funding are another blow to 🇺🇸 science But they will also harm international collaborations, the lifeblood of science and health 🌐 Where is the US medical leadership and outrage? My new piece @bmj_latest www.bmj.com/content/393/...
Science story about today’s Bethesda Declaration report. www.science.org/content/arti...
Worth a read. Many have taken note of the growing solidarity in the science community in opposition to the OMB proposed rule. But this must be just the start. For an example, we can look to @sekahn.bsky.social, Justin Ryder & co who spoke up at ADA and were removed for it. 🧵
19h
2d
21h
1d
10h
Follow-up report by current and former agency employees describes ongoing science censorship by political appointees and “culture of fear”
www.science.org
NIH’s destruction continues, Bethesda Declaration signers say
Please Tell Me It Is Only a Nightmare—The Proposed Dismantling of the United States Federal Research Infrastructure
Steven E. Kahn, Cheryl A.M. Anderson, John B. Buse, Elizabeth Selvin, Vanita R. Aroda, Seth A. Berkowitz, Matthew J. Crowley, Stephanie L. Fitzpatrick, Meg
diabetesjournals.org
Jenna Norton
Jeremy Berg
Jocalyn Clark
27 UNIHTED
The strong collective response of the science community to the proposed OMB rule has demonstrated the broad unity that’s possible when we all work together. We'd do well to apply this same level of activation to the larger assaults on science and democracy. My new post: blog.ucs.org/gretchen-gol...
1d
The brave @sekahn.bsky.social removed from the ADA for distributed a publisehd op-ed critical of the admin is here on Bluesky. Give him a follow.
The scientific community is fighting a proposed change to research funding. Let's keep this momentum going to take on more attacks on science.
blog.ucs.org
19h
The Science Community Is Stepping Up. Let’s Go Bigger.
Good discussion of the losses to science agencies, including a call out to Bethesda Declaration: one year later. federalnewsnetwork.com/workforce/20...
19h
Gretchen Goldman, PhD
New research from the Partnership for Public Service finds that many science agencies were cut deeply in the Trump administration’s workforce overhauls.
Jenna Norton
federalnewsnetwork.com
Federal science agencies facing a ‘generational loss,’ nonprofit says | Federal News Network
Jenna Norton
🧪This is history in the making. On this day last year, @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social et al. penned the #BethesdaDeclaration criticizing the politicization of the #NIH. Cancer research grants supporting clinical trials were terminated, halting clinical trials. Fewer grants were funded.🧪
19h
Princess Vimentin PhD | Cancer Biologist
New report from the Bethesda Declaration team, taking stock after a year. www.27unihted.org/bethesda-dec... 1/3
1d
www.27unihted.org
Bethesda Declaration One Year Later — 27 UNIHTED
Jeremy Berg
We published an article written by a number of current and former peer review workers in their personal capacities outlining the changes to peer review at the NIH over the last 18 months. It’s a great resource, and we’re grateful to the authors who wrote it! open.substack.com/pub/27unihte...
2d
Authored by anonymous current and former NIH workers with experience in peer review, this is an overview of all the changes to NIH's peer review over the last 18 months.
open.substack.com
The Quiet Attack On Science: Subverting NIH Peer Review
27 UNIHTED
Steven Kahn