So I'm hearing that they're safer and less polluting than the average car, but they're still bad due to micro plastic and rubber. Even though all cars would have that same issue.
Which part?
This guy is the classic status quo Dem that everyone hates. Why is he leading?
I see, that makes sense. Since you seem to have thought about this a lot: do you think it's plausible that cheap robotaxis will end up allowing more people to go car-free? That would have a lot of benefits for cities imo.
A PAC that supports him I assume? The guy doesn't name the PAC.
Agreed, cities need to be restructured for this to work. One big impediment to that is parking. If a combination of transit and robotaxis becomes reliable and cheap enough to substitute for car ownership, that makes new building types possible. That's my hope.
Ok the PAC is in the original post. It's a Bacerra PAC. This doesn't change the implication imo.