//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
This is so satisfying.
Exhibit A: Claude Opus 4.7 is very keen to protect user's data from being harmed by speccing an app that we haven't even begun building yet.
1mo
1mo
youtu.be
YouTube video by Regular Car Reviews
2025 Tesla Cybertruck: Regular Car Reviews
I would say Opus 4.7 no longer understand the Software Dev Lifecycle - but I'd go further to say it no longer understands what the order of operations are in relation to real-world time.
And now, Opus 4.7 has just flagged a discussion about business funding strategy as being potentially harmful and ended the chat. What on earth??
These will need to be extracted, but it should not be necessary. Opus 4.6 understood its role, and got on with it. 4.7 feels like I have to get lawyers in to negotiate on what is or is not a valid specification while the LLM just shouts "YAGNI" and sits down for a cup of tea.
1mo