These will need to be extracted, but it should not be necessary.
Opus 4.6 understood its role, and got on with it.
4.7 feels like I have to get lawyers in to negotiate on what is or is not a valid specification while the LLM just shouts "YAGNI" and sits down for a cup of tea.
I would say Opus 4.7 no longer understand the Software Dev Lifecycle - but I'd go further to say it no longer understands what the order of operations are in relation to real-world time.
Anther example of Opus 4.7 going to shit.
It is struggling to distinguish basic scopes of user interaction. It confuses our requirements as a developer/agent pair with that of the eventual post-deployment user of the system. I have to explain the difference...
We haven't built it yet, Claude! ðŸ«
This is so satisfying.
And now, Opus 4.7 has just flagged a discussion about business funding strategy as being potentially harmful and ended the chat. What on earth??