it seems the only rationale for jumping on the genai bandwagon is the fabricated fomo (not actual benefit to research)
and this is not surprising tbh. the ai industry has poured millions into setting much of the ai "potential benefit” discourse
There are way more AI "writers" than readers of AI "writing" out there, I'll say that much. Maybe if it already feels like screaming into the void, you stop caring about the quality of the screaming?
Since starting my newsletter a year and a half ago, I've been reading a lot more of other people's writing
And the conclusion I've come to is that most people simply don't know how to post
Oh, you're a UX designer? Then name every user
Hi! I'm Bret Rhett Chet, here to tell you why you should buy and hodl SpaceX stonk. For a mere $135/share, you get pro forma tangible book value of $7.85/share, an immediate 94% dilution. New investors are putting up 48% of all capital ever invested in SpaceX in exchange for 4.2% of the shares.
/1