//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
1/ Another @sadcatlab.bsky.social paper 👀 Cognitive change methods and cognitive change in CBTs: are they important? What do we know? What is anything? Here we draw a link between the literature on cognitive reappraisal and cognitive restructuring in CBTs. psycnet.apa.org/record/2027-...
“But Colette. Calling Congress doesn’t make a difference!” You wanna fucking bet? I sit in meeting nearly every week where staffers tell me they aren’t hearing about these issues. SQUEAKY WHEEL GETS THE GREASE, YOU GUYS!
Nice reminder that because a study is published in a journal does not mean it’s a good study or that its stated conclusions are reasonable! When people say they are “doing their own research,” even if reading primary literature, missing the context & subtleties can lead to wildly wrong conclusions.
This will be something that seems like a drop in our daily dumpster fire life, but mark my words, it will be cited in history books.
Maybe of interest: The submission guidelines of Psychological Science now demand an explicit statement on measures taken to reduce the risk of AI-generated responses for all online studies! www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...