//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
An observation I do not see talked about much in feminist/masculinities discourse is the degree to which the notion that it’s unmanly to be emotional likely arises, historically, from the number of men who have reacted to experiencing strong emotions by doing violence.
Anthropic is doing this because they think they might actually build the Singularity (or failing that, get AI on an ever-accelerating trajectory) and they're wrong. Physical & economic constraints are biting harder and harder even as shocking new capabilities develop.
I mean given the trajectory of open weight models I’d be astounded if we have to wait more than 18 months for them to get caught up
I mean, it's not gonna even work. This is a bandaid that'll only modestly slow distillation down. I guess that's useful when AI is advancing really fast but this barrier will be utterly meaningless the moment the next AI winter hits (even if it's just slow advancement rather than stagnation).
i am in the open faction. i would like to be in a safety faction but i think the safety faction that actually exists is wrong about everything that matters
the part where they say they're going to silently sabotage us based on completely opaque criteria