//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
When you realize there's a large subject area that you don't want to include in your review
After the post #ASMS2026 @asms.org Board meeting, we're still smiling. Thanks all who came to SD to make it a great conference! We'll miss Elyssia Gallagher, Heather Desaire, @iondoctor.bsky.social and @lablaskin.bsky.social on the Board. Give us your feedback on the post-conf survey - more 🍦?
2d
My favorite is her "okay Dad" which could be interpreted a couple ways
They are available on my LinkedIn from some post this spring
Web of Science no longer links or exports to Endnote Web even though they are both owned by Clarivate. Before I could at see at a glance if a paper was already in my library. Now there's *really* no reason to use Web of Science while Scholar remains the only Google product resisting enshittification
LLMs are obviously garbage for writing scientific results (unless it's a turn-the-crank report, in which case I'm not bothering to read anyway). But I strongly suspect an LLM could believably reproduce the cliches of popular science writing and press releases.
Someone crop this so I don't look sinister