I want to narrow Mark's take a bit, bc I think this morning's ruling *may have some implications for thwarting potential *prosecution in the *future,
but *doesn't really offer anything to prevent or block the investigatory *persecution that the DOJ is *currently conducting
Barred and Boujee aka Madiba Dennie
This may have implications for the Trump administration's unlawful persecution of Rhode Island Hospital for treating transgender minors. DOJ has conducted this "investigation" from Texas to get the assistance of a lunatic MAGA judge. But it's not at all clear DOJ can charge the hospital in Texas.
Mark Joseph Stern
The Supreme Court's third AND FINAL decision is Abouammo v. U.S., holding that a defendant charged with falsifying records must be tried where the falsification occurred under the Sixth Amendment. Unanimous, per Kagan. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
