//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Senior writer at Slate covering courts and the law. Co-host of the Amicus podcast. Dad.
Mark Joseph Stern









Loading...
The ACLU filed suit on behalf of a Florida man who was wrongly arrested due to a false facial recognition match, and the alleged facts are a doozy storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
The Civil Rights Division says hey, we sure did make some factually incorrect statements in a warrant application in the Cities Church case, but pobody's nerfect! storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
I'm stuck on this—the WaPo editorial board uncritically repeated a lie that right-wing rage merchants manufactured by selectively editing a video then splattering it across X. It seems these guys' brains have been so cooked by Elon's algorithm that they can no longer identify MAGA-manipulated slop.
Now here is a grand juror doing the 5th Amendment proud www.documentcloud.org/documents/28...
Here's the part where the prosecutors identify the grand jurors who won't vote to indict, then dismiss them one by one so they can secure an indictment from those who remain (you need a minimum of 16) www.documentcloud.org/documents/28...
The first grand jury proceeding in the Broadview Six case began with a *textbook example* of forbidden prosecutorial vouching. Misconduct from the start. Just incredible stuff.
1h
2h
21h
2h
21h
21h
BTW this error illustrates a trick I've noticed in these editorials: Any criticism of a Republican must be accompanied by criticism of a Democrat, and the Democrat will often be blamed, at least in part, for whatever bad thing the Republican did. I see why "tearfully conceded" was so tempting here.