And Jorge Gaxiola Lappe suggested an alternative to US delineation of the limits of speech and defamation, in favor of one that appreciates regret over moral remainders of conflict of rights.
[4/5]
We continue in just over an hour and a half, starting with Nick Smith discussing punishing remorseful vs remorseless offenders.
First day was amazing, today is shaping up to be as well 💫
Hit me up for the link!
@gould.usc.edu
I'm looking for a podcast/YouTube that does a good job with theory (and/or practice) of Unjust Enrichment.
Any ideas?
Self promotion is encouraged!
Join us tomorrow at 9 am PDT (12 noon Eastern), starting with Zoe Sinel on a tort law theory of emotions, ending with Jisha Menon on vulnerability, shame and the sex offender, and much more in between!
Message me for links
[5/5]
Angelo Ryu and Anna Dvorishchina offered that alienation from our own personhood is the main reason to avoid political supression of expression of emotions;
[3/5]
Nick Smith asked: if remorseful offenders deserve mitigatigation of punishment, does that mean remorseless ones deserve aggravation of it?
[2/5]
The Online conference continues TOMORROW, May 19th, at 10:20 am PDT (1:20 pm Eastern), with Nick Smith on punishing remorseful and remorseless offenders!
Third and final day of the conference is this Wednesday, May 21!
Contact me for more details, and zoom links!