And Jorge Gaxiola Lappe suggested an alternative to US delineation of the limits of speech and defamation, in favor of one that appreciates regret over moral remainders of conflict of rights.
[4/5]
Tomorrow (Wednesday, May 21 at 9 am PDT, 12 noon Eastern), is the third and final day of the @gould.usc.edu Online conference "Philosophy of Emotions Meets Philosophy of Law"!
Yesterday's second session was absolutely fascinating!
[1/5]
We continue in just over an hour and a half, starting with Nick Smith discussing punishing remorseful vs remorseless offenders.
First day was amazing, today is shaping up to be as well 💫
Hit me up for the link!
@gould.usc.edu
Angelo Ryu and Anna Dvorishchina offered that alienation from our own personhood is the main reason to avoid political supression of expression of emotions;
[3/5]
I'm looking for a podcast/YouTube that does a good job with theory (and/or practice) of Unjust Enrichment.
Any ideas?
Self promotion is encouraged!
Nick Smith asked: if remorseful offenders deserve mitigatigation of punishment, does that mean remorseless ones deserve aggravation of it?
[2/5]
Join us tomorrow at 9 am PDT (12 noon Eastern), starting with Zoe Sinel on a tort law theory of emotions, ending with Jisha Menon on vulnerability, shame and the sex offender, and much more in between!
Message me for links
[5/5]
