There are examples of that in the NY Times Opinion section hosting Never Trump Republicans like David Brooks or Nicholas Kristof, but the Times' readership base is largely liberal and so fewer right wingers react at all to their opeds.
For more right wing orgs, maybe the Wall Street Journal would?
Hey Fulton, Pitts and Morris listened to me and allies on this. They made it happen. Vote for them, not for the faux progressives who are in Dickens’s and Big Commercial’s pockets.
Mo will undo fair data center taxation and also hand Andre the county’s TAD money.
Budget and Jail crisis in 3,2,1.
Yeah that's further than I'd go and is annoyingly tougher to pull off via amendment when regular legislation could handle it. That said, I do ultimately like a legislature so large it forces less floor discussion and a larger number of more specific committees.
Trump does seem like he's flailing now. I'm generally skeptical the US government doesn't approve Israeli strikes, but Yemen is closing Bab al Mandab and Trump really doesn't want high gas prices.
But if the US doesn't start treating Israel like the rogue state it is they'll keep the wars going.
NASDAQ will have it but the really big prize, the S&P 500, rejected rule changes to add SpaceX. So while its not good that NASDAQ bent its rules, a lot of (maybe most) index investors are dodging this bullet.
Just a note: Ansar Allah announced a closing of the Bab al Mandab to specifically Israeli affiliated/bound ships.
x.com/AryJeayBacku...
the problem with that approach is that while the success of that strategy is uncertain, what is certain is the hugely negative response the US/Israel would receive both internationally and (at least in the US' case) internally.
Hawks portray that as moralism when its actually concern for blow back.
@kelseabondatl.bsky.social Here's a good tool to talk about the possible results of TAD extension (with the caveat that higher numbers mean LESS money for APS as that's redirected to Invest Atlanta). This might be the clearest explanation of the problem of TAD extensions I've seen!
Wouldn't the logical conclusion here be that the theory of "give Israel material support to influence their decision making" is more discredited by this example than "remove support from Israel to influence their decision making"?
The anti-imperialist argument is we should stop supporting Israel.
Yeah reform should probably include something like "the number of house seats shall be determined such that the number of people represented per seat will enable the smallest state to have at least 2 equal sized districts". Which would also make gerrymandering generally trickier to pull off.