//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
Many decks talk about “reg risk” and “reimbursement” in a single bullet. This piece goes deeper: * How to test “What do regulators think you are?” * Why coding, coverage, and payment must be separate conversations * How policy (like orphan incentives or DME categories) can turn path risk into upside
Your unique value proposition isn't ""I'm good at my job."" Everyone in this field is good at their job. It's the specific combination of technical strengths, transferable skills, and differentiators that makes you the right person for a particular problem.