//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
šŸ“¢ BREAKING! TiCS just published a paper by @lamalab.bsky.social and me that synthesizes co-registration (and related) studies of reading that resolve the apparent paradox that the eyes move faster through the text than the brain can understand it!
Some research fields have a type of paper that basically asks: "What if a more expensive but less reliable machine can do [this] instead?"
How to join zillions of lexical norms to each word in your language sample the easy way: a quick tutorial and demo reilly-lab.github.io/Jamie_JoinLe...
2mo
1mo
2mo
Looking inside and beyond eye fixations in reading Opinion by Elizabeth R. Schotter & Brennan R. Payne Free access before May 17: tinyurl.com/bde7p834
The need for positive data is the original sin of science. To exist in science, you need grants. To get grants, you need to publish papers. To publish papers, you need positive data. This leads to null data staying in file drawers, and false or misleading positive data being published.
How do we read faster than our brains process each word? Out now in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, @lizschotter.bsky.social and I explore how co-registering eye-tracking and EEG helps solve this paradox by looking "beyond" the individual fixation to probe dynamic coupling between the brain and eyes.
How do we read faster than our brains process each word? Out now in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, @lizschotter.bsky.social and I explore how co-registering eye-tracking and EEG helps solve this paradox by looking "beyond" the individual fixation to probe dynamic coupling between the brain and eyes.
2mo
Online Now: Looking inside and beyond eye fixations in reading
Online Now: Looking inside and beyond eye fixations in reading
1mo
2mo
2mo
2mo
2mo
We received the an invitation from the Federation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences (FABBS) for CNS members who are faculty to join a discussion on 4/10 about federal science funding: us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi... This is in response to the the President's budget request for FY27. 1/
The game is to destroy academia and take control of universities. Throttling science funding is just one more move in the broader assault against #highered. Fight back. Don't give in. Don't give up. #AAUP #Standupforscience 5/5
2mo
Malte Elson
2mo
Co-registration of neural and behavioral measures is key in developing a holistic understanding of reading. However, researchers must study not only n…
Looking inside and beyond eye fixations in reading
www.sciencedirect.com
Co-registration of neural and behavioral measures is key in developing a holistic understanding of reading. However, researchers must study not only n…
www.sciencedirect.com
Looking inside and beyond eye fixations in reading
Jamie Reilly 🦜
Co-registration of neural and behavioral measures is key in developing a holistic understanding of reading. However, researchers must study not only neural effects inside fixations, early enough to initiate saccade decisions, but also later effects that are linguistically driven. Furthermore, researchers must not only use co-registration to allow for naturalistic reading but also to look beyond individual fixations to examine the coupling between temporally extended neural language processing and saccade decisions. Such an approach has revealed that saccade decisions are triggered at an intermediate point of lexical processing, followed by complete recognition and integration of a word into its context. This account can resolve the apparent paradox that the eyes can move through text faster than the brain understands it.
dlvr.it
Looking inside and beyond eye fixations in reading
Looking inside and beyond eye fixations in reading
Co-registration of neural and behavioral measures is key in developing a holistic understanding of reading. However, researchers must study not only neural effects inside fixations, early enough to initiate saccade decisions, but also later effects that are linguistically driven. Furthermore, researchers must not only use co-registration to allow for naturalistic reading but also to look beyond individual fixations to examine the coupling between temporally extended neural language processing and saccade decisions. Such an approach has revealed that saccade decisions are triggered at an intermediate point of lexical processing, followed by complete recognition and integration of a word into its context. This account can resolve the apparent paradox that the eyes can move through text faster than the brain understands it.
dlvr.it
500 million+ members | Manage your professional identity. Build and engage with your professional network. Access knowledge, insights and opportunities.
www.linkedin.com
Sign Up | LinkedIn
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Randy Ellis
Language and Memory Aging Lab
Language and Memory Aging Lab
Cognitive Neuroscience Society
Video
Erin J. Wamsley šŸ§ šŸ“ˆšŸ˜“
Join Lexical Norms to Your Word List
Your word list should ideally be nested in Tidy format (one word per row, within one column of a dataframe). Your word vector should NOT be a factor but a chr. Set up your word list like this. You can split/unlist a language sample to get it in this format also.
reilly-lab.github.io
Science activists and allies mobilizing to save science, health and democracy itself from the Trump administration's dismantlement and privatization.
www.standupforscience.net
STAND UP FOR SCIENCE