Update: Thanks to great PCI reviewers, we've made it more precise and connected our concepts more explicitly to existing literature. We even changed the title, hopefully to a better joke:
Wolff, W., Gluth, S., & Keyser, J. (2026). We don’t care how much you sweat: An epistemic framework for […]
Wichtige Artikel-Serie zum Thema #openscience
Wem gehört die Wissenschaft – und wem sollte sie gehören?
Das Blog-Symposium „Wem gehört die Wissenschaft?“ greift diese Frage auf und beleuchtet Facetten der Organisation von Wissenschaft als Gemeingut, der Eigentums- und Machtverhältnisse im […]
A "Nutri-Score", but for the lab 😁
We uploaded a preprint with our thoughts on optimal lab technology for complex questions. We hope it's as much fun to read as it was writing it:
Wolff, W., Gluth, S., & Keyser, J. (2025, December 6). Considerations for setting up an S-tier behavioral and […]
@twoowls73
Hahaha, just another (lovely!) case of getting what I _wrote_ into the computer, not what I _thought of_ 😅
Is your lab doing code reviews? I'd like to learn from your experiences and practices!
In our teams, we're establishing internal peer-reviews of our research software. Our focus is on the correctness of our "one-off" analysis scripts that our results are based on. Because of that, the usual […]
