Is your lab doing code reviews? I'd like to learn from your experiences and practices!
In our teams, we're establishing internal peer-reviews of our research software. Our focus is on the correctness of our "one-off" analysis scripts that our results are based on. Because of that, the usual […]
Regarding internal code reviews: We've drafted an initial version for our internal use. Feel free to comment on it, or copy and adapt it to your own team. We expect that it will change when we get more experienced, so take it with a grain of salt […]
Update: Thanks to great PCI reviewers, we've made it more precise and connected our concepts more explicitly to existing literature. We even changed the title, hopefully to a better joke:
Wolff, W., Gluth, S., & Keyser, J. (2026). We don’t care how much you sweat: An epistemic framework for […]
A "Nutri-Score", but for the lab 😁
We uploaded a preprint with our thoughts on optimal lab technology for complex questions. We hope it's as much fun to read as it was writing it:
Wolff, W., Gluth, S., & Keyser, J. (2025, December 6). Considerations for setting up an S-tier behavioral and […]
Wichtige Artikel-Serie zum Thema #openscience
Wem gehört die Wissenschaft – und wem sollte sie gehören?
Das Blog-Symposium „Wem gehört die Wissenschaft?“ greift diese Frage auf und beleuchtet Facetten der Organisation von Wissenschaft als Gemeingut, der Eigentums- und Machtverhältnisse im […]
