I’m a climate scientist. Let me fix this headline.
“Nearly a century ago, scientists showed that burning fossil fuels warms the planet.
Today, we know human emissions account for over 100% of the warming.
Yet dark money and disinformation still work to keep Americans addicted to fossil fuels.”
Angela Rayner was dragged through every front page for weeks...
HMRC's verdict: NOT deliberate. NOT even careless.
Farage pockets £5 million and chooses not to declare it
So where's the wall-to-wall coverage?
Tell me this isn't a rigged game.
This is the President of the United States who can’t handle the truth without throwing a fit and storming off. He reeks of weakness.
"Countries are already starting to get to grips with this reality. [...]
China’s state-owned oil and gas company Sinopec has already cancelled a planned expansion of an LNG import terminal. Vietnam’s Vingroup has cancelled 4.8GW of LNG-fuelled power generation."
As misleading headlines go, that has to be up there with some of the worst!
As is the claim that "Immigration is fuelling mass unemployment among under-25s."
The "shocking new study" does NOT show that at all 🙄
🧵
1/21
Listened to @mliebreich.bsky.social interviewing Henrik Andersen, CEO of Vestas, on the Cleaning Up podcast state unequivocally that for Vestas turbines the breakeven period is indeed just 5 months.
Funny how the all the people ransacking the Capitol on January 6 were liberals, plants, and ANTIFA—until there was money to be made from it.
Economists call this diminishing marginal utility. The first dollars change your life. The billionth doesn't. So the argument stops being about consumption and starts being about power.