Inlay

ProfilePosts

Blender users are going to be owned by Anthropic because Claude will be used to develop it. Blender users are farm stock for an AI mega corp from now on.

PVV MP Maikel Boon has publicly accepted responsibility and told De Telegraaf he had thought an altered image [using AI] would no longer be subject to copyright but that it had been a “very stupid act”. www.theguardian.com/world/2026/j...

Nazemian vs. Nvidia aka (copyright vs. AI)

I disagree that ToS allow the use of © works to be used by 3rd parties for commercial products. At a car park you agree to certain terms by the car park firm. BUT, if that firm was allowing Uber Drivers to make use of your car then that would be beyond the ToS. www.billboard.com/pro/google-y...

www.courtlistener.com/audio/105475...

@mexopolis.bsky.social Just a heads up. Using AI Gen based on your own work means the resulting output would be an author-less derivative. Derivatives are separate works in © law and so new © normally arises to the author - But there is NO author with AI Gen. So No ©! bsky.app/profile/trev...

Wait, can you clarify, does this mean clerks were essentially "making judgements" and deciding on motions themselves rather than an actual judge?!

www.reddit.com/r/COPYRIGHT/...

The DSM Copyright Directive’s TDM exceptions were designed for analysis — extracting patterns, trends & correlations — not for models that absorb & recombine protected expression. #Copyright #AI #TDM #DSMDirective #GenerativeAI #IP #CreatorsRights #DigitalPolicy