The rule against viewpoint discrimination is one of the most imptl in First A law. But as I show in a new paper, forthcoming in the U Penn Law Review, the test of viewpoint discrimination has changed a LOT in the past few decades, in good ways and bad. 🧵
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Even if AI makes new jobs, or total labor is stable, there can be lots of side effects that need to be figured out.
Forcing people to leave the country to transfer to a green card, will hurt families, communities, and United States innovation. If you aren't aware, adjustment of status can take many months—if not years. I hope this policy is reconsidered.
if you try to get Claude to speak Armenian it just outputs "delays"!
Seems like glitch tokens are still unresolved.
Interesting (kind of sad?) to see Opus thrown into a loop.
Current discussions on AI's labor impacts seem to glaze over:
How long will the transition take, in our lifetime?
Will wages be the same?
Will power be more/less concentrated?
Will peoples' new jobs be as satisfying as the career they had built?
Will economic mobility be the same?
Check out new semantic search on CourtListener which @dominsta.bsky.social and our lab contributed to!
h/t
For context, this appears to be referencing Adam Unikowsky's Substack post where Unikowsky used Claude to generate a simulated oral argument: adamunikowsky.substack.com/p/simulating...