The rule against viewpoint discrimination is one of the most imptl in First A law. But as I show in a new paper, forthcoming in the U Penn Law Review, the test of viewpoint discrimination has changed a LOT in the past few decades, in good ways and bad. 🧵
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Current discussions on AI's labor impacts seem to glaze over:
How long will the transition take, in our lifetime?
Will wages be the same?
Will power be more/less concentrated?
Will peoples' new jobs be as satisfying as the career they had built?
Will economic mobility be the same?
From oral arguments yesterday!
papers.ssrn.com
<p><span>The prohibition against viewpoint discrimination is one of the oldest and most important principles of First Amendment law. But what it means to viewpo
if you try to get Claude to speak Armenian it just outputs "delays"!
Seems like glitch tokens are still unresolved.
Interesting (kind of sad?) to see Opus thrown into a loop.
Forcing people to leave the country to transfer to a green card, will hurt families, communities, and United States innovation. If you aren't aware, adjustment of status can take many months—if not years. I hope this policy is reconsidered.
Btw, did a bit of a rebranding of the substack. Will endeavor to post more there.
h/t @dbateyko.bsky.social on the Trials & Errors name. Super fitting name for a group whose focus is both in reinforcement learning and in law/governance research.
www.trialserrors.ai
Even if AI makes new jobs, or total labor is stable, there can be lots of side effects that need to be figured out.
Peter Henderson
Peter Henderson
For context, this appears to be referencing Adam Unikowsky's Substack post where Unikowsky used Claude to generate a simulated oral argument: adamunikowsky.substack.com/p/simulating...
