Using secondary legislation to implement stuff like this makes me uncomfortable. Secondary legislation *should* be used for technical details and tweaks like increasing monetary limits, not substantive policy implementation!
I mean, it absolutely isn't a UFC event unless there's a fight in the crowd...
PS you know how I've spent several years pointing out the race/class/status aspects of the children's online safety crusade, as centred in a very privileged London bubble?
Here in Scotland, "young people" start uni at 17 and some as young as 16.
Uni students, under bans and nighttime curfews.