Believing that social media does harm and wishing you spent less time on social media is not the same as supporting a ban on social media.
Always the same playbook and it always ends with a sudden need for yet another 'buffer zone'
invasion>'buffer zone'>occupation>settlement>annexation
Oh yeah right there, "In this survey, Gen Z refers to respondents aged 16-29"
If I knew I wouldn't be asking
Can you share that reliable source please?
They're not inherently misinformation, but citing them as evidence for what under-16s believe when they don't contain that data is misinformation. This is not a difficult concept.
That's 53% of Gen Z as of June 2025, at a time when the proposed ban would've affected people born after 2009 (2010 now). The ban will effect the children of millennials, i.e. 'Gen Alpha', and asking people in their 20s (i.e. current Gen Z) how they feel about that still does not answer my question.
I am once again asking what percentage of under-16s support banning under-16s from social media. Same goalposts as before.
Oh hey look, that's intent.
I don't have exact numbers, but he's talking about permanently displacing and destroying the homes of least 600,000 people in Lebanon and 1,000,000 in Gaza, apparently with a plan to force out tens of thousands more in Syria.
I am once again asking what percentage of under-16s support banning under-16s from social media.
