//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Itinerant scholar from Chicago (he/him) | PhD Middle Eastern Studies | currently @humboldt-foundation.de fellow at @ruhr-uni-bochum.de | formerly @theul.bsky.social | @biajs.bsky.social award-winning author | publications: linktr.ee/NPosegay
Nick Posegay







Loading...
"we can measure sex" no you fucking can't and it was combining philosophy with empirical data that made sexologists stop briefly "We can measure race" still no you fucking can't. "We can measure intelligence" again tiring to have to keep pointing this out but no you fucking can't. And so on
"Third lock on front door is unfair, says guy definintely not trying to break into your house"
16h
22h
www.middleeasteye.net/news/judge-s... 1st time in UK legal history protesters convicted of criminal damage face a 'terrorism connection' on sentencing; 1st time a Judge has tried to criminalise a defendant's Counsel; 1st time a Judge has stopped a defendant's Counsel from defending a defendant.
Humanities researchers be like: "More than half of you guys were adequately funded?"
God's Not Dead 3:
Nick Posegay
Mallory Moore
1d
1d
1d
Begging everyone to push those around them to understand ICE as a logical extension of policing/defense of colonial relations and not some aberrant phenomenon within the otherwise "noble" American project. If I hear one more person "insult" ICE by saying they're not real police I'm gonna snap.
Honestly, its fucking sickening. They were convicted of non-terror offences by a jury, and the judge added a terror endorsement after the fact. It's a complete undermining of the principle of trial by jury, and it should be overturned immediately and the judge removed for judicial misconduct.