A flagship journal in my field uses AI in the editorial process!
Yes, & they even give this vacuous (described below) feedback when they reject papers. I tried pushing back and was told I'm being emotional (sexism red flag) because I can't deal with rejection (lemme laugh for a few minutes).
How you know you're working in the proper sciency part of the university
Our dept is hiring!
Our dept is hiring!
People will always find ways to have an abortion, all bans do is entrench inequality in access
Marjane Satrapi 1969-2026
The family of the Belfast stabbing victim have released a statement saying - like the family of Henry Nowak last week - that the attack should not be used to "divide people or fuel hostility"
They condemned disorder and praised the "valuable contribution" by migrants
inews.co.uk/news/politic...
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ
Claire Pierson
AI-assisted text is deadly for academic journal editors and reviewers.
I'm detecting a lot more of it recently as an editor. It's still there in the "Frankencitations" and those little linguistic "tells" like "AI is not the cause. It's the symptom of an underlying reality." But it's more, too. 1/
