I explicitly were not referring to the subs. Cursor enterprise passes through the token cost, and we're doing ok, with 1k per month. Plus, they'll never be able to raise the prices significantly because of great open (chinese) models.
What was you suggestion to the C-level?
@davekeating.substack.com you don't have a "how the EU actually works" article, do you?
They weren't children's stories to begin with. Many fables even encoded local legal rules and practices, which is super interesting in its own
For 4 months?!? you send them away? Wow...
'The real surprise from the OECD’s subsidy numbers is that it cost China less than $18bn in sectoral support over 15 years to build an industry that can now provide more clean power than the world can readily absorb.'
@adamtooze.bsky.social @financialtimes.com
www.ft.com/content/b6ca...
It's true that the commission must be reformed, but it's not "some bureaucrats". It's members of the governments of the member states. So similar to the US senate, just unnecessarily secretive so that they can at home complain about the EU while actually being at fault themselves...
It's a long way ahead 😅
So you say Anthropic is lying when they say that on inference (only), they are profitable?
IDK about that. And DeepSeek is doing some crazy optimizations lately.
In any case, I think it's a good conv to have, but I doubt the point will happen where a company needs and cannot afford AI anymore
I don't think they ever claimed that for any sub, but just for API prices.
And I disagree in that case:
If all we care is "will LLMs stay as cheap as they are", then only per unit economics matter. Sure OpenAI and Anthropic might go bancrupt, but others will jump in, and the models are already out
"Skateboard association" was NOT what I had in mind when I read "privately run"...