//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
🦷 A new study by @marinemorvan.bsky.social High-throughput paleoproteomics method using MALDI-CASI-FTICR mass spectrometry to estimate biological sex from tooth enamel. Great success on 130 individuals from medieval Great Moravia. #Bioarchaeology #Archaeology #Proteomics #TooMS 😉 #Teammasspec
3mo
Matthew Collins
www.biorxiv.org
The data fit just fine if you assume these 6 samples being from a Denisovan subpopulation and not from a homo erectus relic population.
1mo
(Y|G)iannis P.
While we suspect incomplete lineage sorting as the main culprit for this result, an older admixture between Neanderthal and humans, a 'super-archaic' admixture into Denisovans or other scenarios could be at play.
Given the recent and upcoming recovery of ancient proteins from archaic human remains this would be something to keep in mind. The missmatch of autosomal, mitochondrial, Y chromosome and morphology-based trees is already complicated for these groups, proteins might add some to that complexity!
Interesting points! If you look at the protein data alone, there are no recovered variants that support these samples being very divergent from modern humans, e.g. 'H.erectus like'. For comparison, the H.antecessor enamel had a variant, placing it as an outgroup to nean, deni, and present day humans
To me it's more likely that the 'homo erectus' variant emerged later, on top of the haplotype that carries the 'Denisovan-like' variant. So after an introgression event happened, if it did happen for this protein.
3mo
3mo
In fact, in the trees of enamel, collagen and other bone/dentin proteins, humans and Neanderthals appear closer to eachother as often as Neanderthals appear closer to Denisovans. This persists even when only looking at sub-saharan African populations, who have limited archaic introgression.
The two variants that are recovered are also found on the same protein! If they were introgressed from homo erectus, they likely would have been linked together due to their physical proximity on the genome, and Denisovans would have inherited both.
1mo
1mo
3mo
1mo
In short we find that while only a few proteins are needed to resolve the tree between humans - chimpanzees - gorillas, the same cannot be said for the tree of modern humans - Neanderthals - Denisovans.
3mo
The final chapter of my PhD thesis, is finally published in GBE! academic.oup.com/gbe/article/... You can also read the earlier recommendation by PCI in a nice little summary here: evolbiol.peercommunityin.org/articles/rec... #palaeoproteomics #phylogenetics
3mo
(Y|G)iannis P.
(Y|G)iannis P.
(Y|G)iannis P.
(Y|G)iannis P.
(Y|G)iannis P.
(Y|G)iannis P.
(Y|G)iannis P.
(Y|G)iannis P.