No, I am attacking a party that is openly debating the meaning of the word antisemitism itself (and has a caucus that appears to object to not only the word but *any* definition of it)
Our response appears to say that we're sad about the riots and.... not do anything
Don't be silly Tom
Not to be all "what are you doing" but is there going to be any actual practical changes arising from a series of far right riots leaving people afraid and trapped in their own homes?
Marie in a year
No, I dont think you get to go IHRA or JRA? Which should be use? when what your party is actually debating is 'does antisemitism refer to Jews?'
BREAKING: Police Scotland have broken their silence 17 hours after violence and disorder was seen across the country.
Three members of the public were attacked because of the colour of their skin, it has been confirmed.
The motion will be brought back, won't it? Without this being removed from it; you will explicitly be debating whether the Greens accept that antisemitic hatred refers to Jews.
IHRA/JRA, whatever. You can't even agree to let Jews get to use the term antisemitism to refer to hatred against them
Know I've already shared info about Anaka Collective, but they've now set up a specific donations drive after last night. Throw them a few quid if you can. They do amazing work.
chuffed.org/project/1854...
How many reject the term antisemitism altogether, which is what you're considering? Or reject all definitions?
How representative do you think they are of the Jewish community as a whole?