//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
The first publication was in Georgian in 1947 and the second in Russian in the journal Sovetskaya Arkheologia in 1972. I think the linguistic and political divides of the Cold War period were the reason why no one connected the Ureki brooch to the brooches we already knew about.
In the paper I argue that Roman emperors gave gold brooches and medallions to rulers beyond the frontier as diplomatic gifts. Finding them in graves in Slovakia, Romania, and now Georgia tells us something about how Rome managed relationships with rulers it couldn't formally control.
I'm very sorry for your loss
24d
Ha, me too!
I tracked down the original publications. It was found in 1942 near the village of Ureki on the Black Sea coast of Georgia. Neither the dating nor the archaeological context are very secure, but it seems to fall into the late 3rd-early 4th c CE. This fits with the date ranges of the other brooches.
Even though their archaeological context is limited, these brooches tell an interesting story about Roman imperialism. But there's another layer: there is a second story about how archaeological interpretations are shaped by modern (geo)politics.
Important news