"Gov't couldn't meet it's burden" it's really a novel legal technicality.
Was cited for 61mph in a 50mph
Learned cameras have a margin of error +/- 1mph
Govt is arguing "he was doing at least 11mph over"
Court: He could have been doing 10mph over cause of MOE, you can't meet your burden.
Dan Izzo
A D.C.-based attorney spent three years fighting a $100 ticket he got from a speed camera in the city. He eventually won in D.C.'s highest court on a novel legal technicality, and thousands of other drivers could end up benefitting from it: www.notus.org/metro/dc-law...
Matt Ricciardi got the citation tossed out by the D.C. Court of Appeals. His victory could benefit other drivers.
