(The answer to grade inflation, btw, isn't "tougher" grading. It's recognizing that grading, especially letter grading--not a very old system--serves employers but not students. It incentivizes cheating & corruption. Other evaluative frameworks are possible.)
I’d read this thread. And share it with departments claiming that gAI is not problematic.
Fwiw, I’ve had similar discussions with students in my classes, too. They’re exhausted, angry, confused and more.
This is bait but what the fuck did people expect their cheetos to be made of, fish and beans????
Yep, the idea of a ‘carbon footprint‘ was developed by Ogilvy & Mather, a New York City-based British advertising and public relations firm working for BP:
www.clf.org/blog/the-tru...